Google Results – A new variation
September 17th, 2005 at 11:56pm
I was searching for information on the movie ‘The Island’, and i keyed in the terms in google, and the results were a bit unusual. Well, I am not sure if this is old one, but I am noticing this for the first time… Check out the screen shot :
Click on the above image to see the full screen shot
Right in between the search results, there is a section which reads …
‘See results for: The island movie’
Has anyone else seen this sort of results?
Tags: google, google search, result page, results, search, search engine, search engines, serp
Entry Filed under: Net
Related Posts
- Single character search results on google
- Is google behaving as you want it to ?
- Google Logos!
- Yahoo Mail – Advance Search Bug ?
- A week gone by…
5 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
OT:
Why did you move your feeds to headlines instead of full text? Please move it to full text! Thanks!
JD
Comment by JD — September 18, 2005 #
hi arjun,
hey is it that the term movie has been automatically juxtaposed or is it that a few search results come and then the suggestion then demarcation and then the result?
one more thing I echo JD’s request, only the headlines comes in teh feed all of a sudden … change na to the full text
c u
sathya
Comment by sathya — September 18, 2005 #
I just searched for “The Island’. It somehow automatically detected it was a movie!. See the full screenshot.
Yes, it was normal results, then demarcation and then movie related results, and then back to normal results!
Had disabled full feeds bcoz off late i had some problems with content aggregaters. Anyway, since I have got many requests to re-enable it, I have enabled it for now!. Will do some R&D and see what best can be done.
Comment by Arjun — September 18, 2005 #
Weird, i cannot see the same ?
Comment by bhaskar — September 18, 2005 #
I can still see the same results. I guess they are doing some kind of testing. BTW, i am logged on using a google account and doing the search. Is it because of that ?
Comment by Arjun — September 18, 2005 #